Author(s):
Dr. Aaron Yelowitz - University of Kentucky
Publication Date:
December 2005
Adobe Acrobat Reader:
PDF files require the free Adobe Acrobat Reader which can be downloaded from the Adobe website. Click here >
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Author(s): Dr. Aaron Yelowitz - University of Kentucky Publication Date: December 2005 Adobe Acrobat Reader: PDF files require the free Adobe Acrobat Reader which can be downloaded from the Adobe website. Click here > |
![]()
How Did the $8.50 Citywide Minimum Wage Affect the Santa Fe Labor Market? A Comprehensive Examination
Overview In June 2004 Santa Fe became one of three cities in the United States to pass a city-wide minimum wage applying to private businesses. The city's increase to $8.50 an hour-a 65 percent increase-affected all businesses within city limits employing more the 25 people. The wage floor is scheduled to increase to $9.50 on January 1, 2006, to $10.50 on January 1, 2008, and then it will be indexed to inflation in the years following. With the wage hike in effect for nearly a year and a half-and with another increase to $9.50 on the horizon-it is appropriate to empirically assess the labor market affects of Santa Fe's minimum wage. This paper by Dr. Aaron Yelowitz, a respected labor and health economist at the University of Kentucky, builds upon an earlier work published in September, 2005. It extends the results of the original paper and addresses a number of unfounded criticisms made by supporters of minimum wage increases-specifically those by Drs. Robert Pollin and Jeanette Wicks-Lim.
Employment Effects Dr. Yelowitz found that the likelihood of unemployment for employees in Santa Fe went up by 3.3 percent. For less-educated employees, however, the results were much higher, with their likelihood of unemployment increasing 8.3 percentage points. In addition, the usual hours of work fell by 1.0 hours for the full sample and 3.2 hours for less-educated individuals. All of these results are statistically significant within a 95 percent confidence interval.
Displacement of Low-Skill Employees
Criticisms of Earlier Research Dr. Yelowitz also highlights the fact that a large number of the criticisms lodged by Pollin and Wicks-Lim disagree with earlier statements made by the authors. In particular, Pollin and Wicks-Lim criticize Yelowitz for not using labor force participation and employment-to-population, despite the fact that Pollin and Wicks-Lim explicitly reject using these measures in previous works. This paper documents the series of discrepancies in Pollin and Wicks-Lim work that casts serious doubt on the validity of their criticism.
Conclusion |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2010 Employment Policies Institute. All Rights Reserved.
View Privacy Policy.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||